"AIDS Denialism" versus "GALLOS Egg" Part One


Parts 1,2,3,4,&5 show how The Robert Gallo HIV Egg is Cracking -- What if everything that you thought you knew about AIDS was wrong? Starting with Robert Gallos 1984 gaffe with Margaret Heckler at the HHS press conference, the personification of HIV as a super-villain precipitated a new pharmaceutical war worth hundreds of billions of dollars. It also caused the deaths of thousands of "AIDS" victims who were corralled into AZT chemotherapy because of a false fear of a retrovirus. After the Semmelweis Society International (SSI) presented Peter Duesberg and Celia Farber the Clean Hands Award earlier this year, the controversy that erupted caused SSI to hire a P.I., Clark Baker, to investigate claims by AIDS activist groups that "anyone who questioned HIV as the cause of AIDS" is a criminal. Clark joins me to report his findings. Also, David Steele, a prominent Bay Area attorney chimes in on the issue after years of handling cases involving cancer and AIDS. Robert Scott Bell has covered this issue before, but not like this. Although HIV has never been proven to be deadly, the pharmaceutical treatment for it certainly has. Enough with this culture of death. Its time that the truth comes out.++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++http://...







Channel: Education
Uploaded: August 12, 2008 at 5:37 pm
Author: HIVVideos

Length: 00:09:07
Rating: 3.00
Views: 773

Tags: Africa TOXIC Lies SemmelWeiss Myths ARV's HIV Baker Dissent Gallo AIDS TESTS AIDSVideos HAART Reappraisal Clark

Embed Code:


Video Comments:
mishimasan (November 19, 2008 at 1:35 pm)
Stop taking the AZT that suppresses your immune system and eat, drink, sleep and be healthy and you'll repair in time. It's the AZT, recreational drugs, toxic lifestyles and malnutrition that cause AIDS.
conotoxin (November 11, 2008 at 6:42 pm)
The magazine Continuum, run by HIV-positive denialists, shut down when all its editors all died of AIDS-related causes.Roflol. You want to play your stupid little HIV denial games you go right ahead. We have a Darwin Award just for you.

If on the other hand, you have a brain, start witht he WIKI on HIV (actually a decent summary). And for pity's sake, if you are HIV+ get treatment. There is no need to die a horrible, excruciating death.
HIVVideos (October 19, 2008 at 11:04 am)
The Branch DNA test is yet another PCR test see the PDF fles FDA website "Donor Screening Assays for Infectious Agents and HIV Diagnostic Assays" which reads:((The VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 Assay (bDNA) is not intended for use as a screening assay for HIV infection or as a diagnostic test to confirm the diagnosis of HIV infection))

Rodney Richards says:
"All that its(bDNA test)looking for is the presence or absence of a fragment of genetic material believed to be unique to HIV"

FRAUD!
mykoolaidtastesfunny (October 18, 2008 at 5:17 am)
The Elisa has no standards. There are seventy conditions which cause people to test +.

Helpforhiv . com has the list and references.

And since the WB is also just an antibody test if one of the 70 conditions is still there when you do the WB you'll continue to get false +'s. The error rate you quote just measn that when you repeat the test you'll most likly get the same result twice.

But that is no proof of WHAT you're testing + for

it could be any one of 70! things.
eVVVVV (October 17, 2008 at 7:03 pm)
koolaid "The VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 Assay (bDNA) is not intended for use as a screening assay for HIV infection or as a diagnostic test to confirm the diagnosis of HIV infection."

Thanks but, yes I know, one uses Elisa and ultimately Western Blot interpretations for that. The 0.0007% error rate is pretty good don't you think?

Just wondered what you thought as to what bDNA was measuring?
mykoolaidtastesfunny (October 17, 2008 at 10:06 am)
The branched Dna? You've already seen that disclaimer as well.

The VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 Assay (bDNA) is not intended for use as a screening assay for HIV infection or as a diagnostic test to confirm the diagnosis of HIV infection.

Rethinkaids . com
eVVVVV (October 17, 2008 at 7:38 am)
"Bullshit. You already know there are no valid tests and you don't want it shoved down your throat AGAIN."

Have you heard the sound of a goose being force fed? It's pretty funny.

No valid tests? Studies have confirmed the accuracy of current methods of HIV testing in false-positive rates of 0.0004% to 0.0007% and false-negative rates of 0.003% in the general population of the US.
Perhaps you could share your thoughts about the branched DNA tests for viral load and why you think they're bogus.
mykoolaidtastesfunny (October 14, 2008 at 8:55 pm)
He knows there's no valid test. That's why he refused to answer me. I've shown him the disclaimers about 40 million times each on other videos.

I think he's being paid by some marketing company. Nobody is as stupid as he pretends to be.
onecleverkid (October 14, 2008 at 7:42 pm)
You still need to back up and first prove that anyone labeled as HIV positive is in fact infected with a deadly virus. Until you do that, all your other suppositions are useless.
mykoolaidtastesfunny (October 14, 2008 at 3:12 pm)
Bullshit. You already know there are no valid tests and you don't want it shoved down your throat AGAIN.

And oh really? The leading aids epidemiologist of the WHO doesn't know what e's talking about?

June 2008

Dr. Kevin de Cock of the World Health Organization: "[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa."

google..There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit

1

 

Privacy Policy Cancer Video | Treatment Survival & Education Copyright © 2007 All Rights Reserved.