Cancer Video | Treatment Survival & Education - hillary, oral sex and 'the children'

hillary, oral sex and 'the children'

For the children?Missus clinton and oral sexby Mia T, 3.2.08

How cheerfully he seems to grin,
How neatly spreads his claws,
And welcomes little fishes in
With gently smiling jaws!
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.

"Is oral sex performed on you within that definition [of sex] as you understood it?" Clinton was asked during his August 17 testimony.

"As I understood it, it was not, no," the president answered.

That testimony that oral sex does not constitute sex, from President Clinton's testimony before the grand jury, was almost nine years ago, but I still remember vividly my immediate reaction:

Kids are going to hear that, and when they do, they're going to start believing that oral sex isn't sex because the president said so....

Five years after Clinton's testimony, came this report: 40 percent of the students have had oral sex and 60 percent of the students do not consider oral sex to be "sex."
(Montrose High School, Montrose, Colorado)

At that point, Bill Clinton should have gone on MTV and told the kids he was wrong, he was lying, of course oral sex is real sex.

But of course he didn't, and for all we hear, oral sex is still entrenched as a suitable short-of-sex sexual act among kids.

More insidious harm to our children from the Clintons: There has been a concomitant increase in STDs from oral sex, and even worse. Cancers! And in increasingly younger children.

Syphilis: "Transmission of the organism occurs during oral sex." (CDC)

Chlamydia: "Chlamydia can be transmitted during oral sex." (CDC)

HIV AIDS: "Yes, it is possible for either partner to become infected with HIV through performing or receiving oral sex. " (CDC)

If it's not sex, Bill, how come it spreads sexually transmitted disease?

If you love kids so much, Hil, why don't you call your husband on his lie and actually protect the children?

The answer, of course, is that they're the Clintons, and nothing is more important to the Clintons than ... THE CLINTONS.

Regarding cancer: Human papilloma virus (HPV), believed to be responsible for most cervical cancers, may also be at the root of many cancers of the mouth andthroat, new research suggests.

"Just as cervical cancer is the outcome of a sexually transmitted disease, as are most anal and penile cancers, people need to be aware that they can get throat or tongue cancer as the consequence of a sexually transmitted disease. Oral sex can't be considered safe sex."

Doctor Erich Sturgis, study author
Associate professor of head and neck surgery and epidemiology
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

"Oral sex cannot be considered safe sex."

How does that ring with Hil and Bill, who are letting it stand that oral sex isn't even sex?From now on, whenever Hil claims her great love of children, think of children with syphilis, chlamydia, HIV/AIDS or tongue or mouth cancer and ask her in your mind, "Are you really 'for the children,' or are you simply for that cancer on America: The Clintons?"

adapted from cheatseekingmissiles.blogspot.com/2007/09/hillary-childrens-advocate-ha.html

Addendum:

LUCINDA FRANKS: I think you're wrong because, after about two years of -- of working on this, you know, on and off, I think the president -- that the teenage culture caused the president's behavior in the way he behaved in -- with the oral sex.

BILL O'REILLY: I think you're crazy, Ms. Franks, with all due respect.

'Fellating Kids and clinton Degeneracy: The Revisionism Begins'

Channel: News
Uploaded: March 3, 2008 at 3:24 am
Author: miat1111

Length: 00:04:12
Rating: 4.51
Views: 16879

Tags: oral clinton barack obama card children hillary the fear sex

Video Comments:

RamOfUSANG (October 19, 2008 at 6:26 pm)

!! I LOVE GETTING on the CAM!! msn!!! msg me jane22fall 7

powertworeach (June 13, 2008 at 10:37 pm)

Check out this youtube (Remember when the Clintons was in office)

Eva33296 (May 31, 2008 at 5:29 am)

TUBECOMMENTS.(INFO) want to blow up your channel or website? get your ad right here with the same software i'm using Like OMG too kool !

nazihorse (May 23, 2008 at 12:28 pm)

this video is more funny then normal video! my names Kayla, kinda feelin bored if any1 wants to join me on cam or wana chat i will be signed on at __ FriendlyFlirts(.COM) __ my user ID there is Kayla_yxwqdfljznte chat soon xx its FR33 to j0in! mwah

supersonicslowmotion (March 7, 2008 at 11:40 pm)

"I don't like the clintons much... "me-I never argued about the clintons being corrupt. I agree they are unethical, and will do anything to hold onto power. All of comments were about what I thought looked like an incomplete picture. (I'm sure not by your you intent) No worries.We will both be in a good mood when she loses this race.

miat1111 (March 7, 2008 at 8:32 pm)

"This is a warning about the CLINTONS, not STDs."-me

On reflection, I can understand your confusion.

miat1111 (March 7, 2008 at 8:27 pm)

If her name were 'Smith' and not 'clinton,' the power-hungry defective would have been laughed off the stage decades ago.

miat1111 (March 7, 2008 at 8:15 pm)

You are confused. I'll give it one last shot.

1- This is a warning about the CLINTONS, not STDs.

2- As for the existence of a vaccine, I assume you are referring the one for cervical cancer. Oral sex is not associated with an increased rate of cervical cancer. Cervical cancer is mentioned for purposes of analogy.

3- The thrust of my argument against the clintons is precisely their willful, self-serving DISINFORMATION campaign about oral sex. This video argues for MORE information, not less.

supersonicslowmotion (March 4, 2008 at 3:57 pm)

Don't pretend I am a laymen because you can compile a video. The vaccine is an important factor.I myself have worked as an aids educator. I have been on the front lines, of the first to educate kids.Even kindergarteners need some info. You may say thats too early, but when you show inner city kids a needle, and ask them if they have ever picked one up on the sidewalk, two thirds often raise their hands. Leaving something out is a big deal. kids already know more then we think they do.

supersonicslowmotion (March 4, 2008 at 3:46 pm)

You did not address my point. you said it indirectly warns about stds but is not about the science. well then it is about the social reality of it. so saying that makes my argument false because this isn't a "treatise" is avoiding the real issue I brought up.My second argument did not say the Clintons were right. If you read my first comment, I said oral sex is sex. my argument is about you cherry picking what you include. The existence of a new vaccine is an important factor.